Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103; 19 CFR 4.50(b)

HQ H097975 March 18, 2010 VES-3-02:RR:BSTC:CCI H097975 ALS CATEGORY: Carriers Ms. Val DeFazio Terminal Shipping Company Georgia Ports Authority Raes Hall Building, Suite F P.O. Box 3152 Savannah, Georgia 31402 RE: Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103; 19 CFR 4.50(b) Dear Ms. DeFazio: This letter is in response to your request with respect to the coastwise transportation of an individual. We received your request on March 17, 2010. Our ruling is set forth below. FACTS: You ask whether an individual may be transported on the non-coastwise qualified YM BUSAN ("vessel"), from Savannah, Georgia to Charleston, South Carolina. The individual might alternatively disembark in Wilmington, North Carolina. The individual will embark on March 18, 2010 in Savannah and disembark in Charleston on March 19, 2010, or in Wilmington on March 21, 2010. You state that the individual will be onboard to fix the remote control on the bridge that controls the main engine’s RPMs (revolutions per minute). ISSUE: Whether the subject individual is a “passenger” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 CFR 4.50(b). LAW AND ANALYSIS: Generally, the coastwise laws prohibit the transportation of passengers or merchandise between points in the United States embraced within the coastwise laws in any vessel other than a vessel built in, documented under the laws of, and owned by citizens of the United States. Such a vessel, after it has obtained a coastwise endorsement from the U.S. Coast Guard, is said to be "coastwise qualified." The coastwise laws generally apply to points in the territorial sea, which is defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline. The coastwise law applicable to the carriage of passengers is found in 46 U.S.C. § 55103 (recodified by Pub. L. 109-304, enacted on October 6, 2006) and provides that: In General. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or chapter 121 of this title, a vessel may not transport passengers between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or via a foreign port, unless the vessel is wholly owned by citizens of the United States for purposes of engaging in the coastwise traffic; and has been issued a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement under chapter 121 or is exempt from documentation but would otherwise be eligible for such a certificate and endorsement. Penalty. The penalty for violating subsection (a) is $300 for each passenger transported and landed. Section 4.50(b), CBP Regulations (19 CFR 4.50(b)) provides as follows: A passenger within the meaning of this part is any person carried on a vessel who is not connected with the operation of such vessel, her navigation, ownership, or business. You state that the subject individual will be onboard to fix the remote control on the bridge that controls the main engine’s RPMs (revolutions per minute). The individual will also review maintenance intervals and required modifications with the crew. In this context, and in accordance with previous Headquarters rulings, workmen, technicians, or observers transported by vessel between ports of the United States are not classified as "passengers" within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 CFR 4.50(b), if they are required to be on board to contribute to the accomplishment of the operation or navigation of the vessel during the voyage or are on board because of a necessary vessel ownership or business interest during the voyage. See CBP Ruling HQ 101699, (November 5, 1975); see also CBP Ruling HQ 116721 (September 25, 2006), quoting CBP Ruling HQ 101699. Thus, in the present case, to the extent that the individual would be engaged in any shipboard activities while traveling on the foreign vessel between coastwise ports, that would be "directly and substantially" related to the operation or business of the vessel itself, as would be the case under the facts herein submitted, such individual would not be considered to be a passenger (see HQ 116721, supra; and CBP Ruling HQ 116659 (May 19, 2006), referencing the "direct and substantial" test). We find that the proposed activity in this case is directly and substantially connected with the operation and business of the vessel. Therefore, we determine that the subject individual is not a "passenger" within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 CFR 4.50(b). Accordingly, the coastwise transportation of the subject individual is not in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. HOLDING: The subject individual is not a "passenger" within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 CFR 4.50(b). Therefore, the coastwise transportation of such individual is not in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. Sincerely, Glen E. Vereb Chief Cargo Security, Carriers and Immigration Branch