Base
G882632001-03-19New YorkClassificationRevoked

The tariff classification of an auto Backseat Organizer from China

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

8708.99.8080

$1139.1M monthly imports

Compare All →

Court Cases

6 cases

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

25 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-04-28 · Updates monthly

Summary

The tariff classification of an auto Backseat Organizer from China

Ruling Text

NY G88263 March 19, 2001 CLA-2-87:RR:NC:MM:101 G88263 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 8708.99.8080 Ms. Joanne Balice Import Department CBI Distributing Corp. Claire’s Accessories 2400 W. Central Road Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60195 RE: The tariff classification of an auto Backseat Organizer from China Dear Ms. Balice: In your letter dated March 12, 2001 you requested a tariff classification ruling. You submitted a sample of an auto Backseat Organizer, Style Number 70985, made of nylon material. It is designed to fit over a car’s headrest so it will face the rear seat. It has various compartments for storage. The applicable subheading for the auto Backseat Organizer will be 8708.99.8080, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for Parts and accessories of the motor vehicles of headings 8701 to 8705: Other parts and accessories: Other: Other: Other: Other…Other. The rate of duty will be 2.5% ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Robert DeSoucey at 212-637-7035. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division

Ruling History

Revoked byH312216

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (2)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.