Base
D878551999-03-01New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of footwear from China

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

6403.99.90

$482.0M monthly imports

Compare All →

Court Cases

1 case

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

27 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-04-28 · Updates monthly

Summary

The tariff classification of footwear from China

Ruling Text

NY D87855 March 1, 1999 CLA-2-64:RR:NC:TA:347 D87855 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6403.99.90 Mr. William P. Klauer Alto Customhouse Brokers 145-03 156 Street Jamaica, NY 11434 RE: The tariff classification of footwear from China Dear Mr. Klauer: In your letter received February 16, 1999, on behalf of Ipanema Shoe, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The submitted sample, no style number indicated, is a woman’s below the ankle, slip-on shoe, with a leather upper and a cemented-on, approximately one inch thick, molded rubber/plastic bottom. The shoe has an elasticized strap across the vamp. The applicable subheading for this shoe will be 6403.99.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear with predominately leather uppers and plastic and/or rubber outer soles, not covering the ankle, valued, we presume, over $2.50 per pair, for other persons. The rate of duty will be 10% ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Richard Foley at 212-637-7089. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division

Related Rulings for HTS 6403.99.90

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (1)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.