U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 2 HTS codes referenced
Primary HTS Code
6403.99.60
$438.9M monthly imports
Compare All →
Federal Register
3 docs
Related notices & rules
Court Cases
1 case
CIT & Federal Circuit
Ruling Age
27 years
Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, Federal Register, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-02 · Updates monthly
The tariff classification of a leather shoe from China.
PD D83626 October 20, 1998 CLA-2-64:G23 D83626 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6403.99.60; 6403.99.90 Mr. Donald L. Perrone Tower Group International 10 Moulton St. Portland, ME 04101-5039 RE: The tariff classification of a leather shoe from China. Dear Mr. Perrone: In your letter dated October 3, 1998, you requested a tariff classification ruling on behalf of your client, Dexter Shoe Company. The sample submitted with your request is style C1002, Tundra, a low-top athletic shoe with an upper of leather and textile with rubber overlays, and an outer sole of rubber. By your analysis the leather component comprises 70% of the upper; per mutual consent, leather is taken to be the constituent material having the greatest external surface area of the upper. In our opinion, this type of footwear is commonly worn by both sexes (i.e., unisex). The sample is being returned. The applicable subheading for this shoe, in sizes up to and including American men's size 8, will be 6403.99.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear with leather uppers and plastic and/or rubber outer soles, not covering the ankle, for other persons. The rate of duty will be 10% ad valorem. For American men's sizes 8.5 and larger, the applicable subheading will be 6403.99.60, HTS, which provides for footwear with leather uppers and plastic and/or rubber outer soles, not covering the ankle, for men, youths and boys. The rate of duty will be 8.5% ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jeffrey Walgreen, Port Director Portland, Maine
Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.
Trade notices, proposed rules, and final rules related to the tariff codes in this ruling.
Request for comments and notice of public hearing.
Notice·Effective 2002-01-23
Notice of determinations and action; notice of proposed action; request for written comments; invitation to participate in public hearing.·Effective 2001-08-02
CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.