U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced
Primary HTS Code
6403.99.90
$438.9M monthly imports
Compare All →
Federal Register
3 docs
Related notices & rules
Court Cases
1 case
CIT & Federal Circuit
Ruling Age
29 years
Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, Federal Register, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-06 · Updates monthly
The tariff classification of a woman's athletic shoe from China
PD B80498 January 10, 1997 CLA-2-64:LA:S:T:1:4D18 PD B80498 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6403.99.90 Mr. Stephen S. Spraitzar Law Offices of George R. Tuttle Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1160 San Francisco, CA 94111 RE: The tariff classification of a woman's athletic shoe from China Dear Mr. Spraitzar: In your letter dated November 6, 1996, received in C.I.E. on December 16, 1996, on behalf of Asics Tiger Corporation, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The submitted sample, style SL 672 "Reliance" is a woman's low cut cross-trainer with a leather, textile, and plastic upper, six eyelet lace closure, and has a rubber and/ or plastic sole with a foxing-like band. You have furnished a lab analysis indicating that the external surface area of the upper, excluding accessories or reinforcements, is 49.1 percent leather, 26.9 percent textile, and 24.0 percent rubber and/or plastic. The applicable subheading for this shoe will be 6403.99.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear, in which the upper's external surface is predominately leather; in which the outer sole's external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastic; which is other than "sports" footwear; in which the top of the upper is below the top of the wearer's ankle bone; in which the sole is attached to the upper by means other than welt stitched construction; which is worn by females and which is valued over $2.50 per pair. The rate of duty will be 10 percent ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Aileen Colon Acting Port Director Los Angeles
Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.
Trade notices, proposed rules, and final rules related to the tariff codes in this ruling.
Request for comments and notice of public hearing.
Notice·Effective 2002-01-23
Notice of determinations and action; notice of proposed action; request for written comments; invitation to participate in public hearing.·Effective 2001-08-02
CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.