Base
8690251991-12-02New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of footwear from China.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

6402.99.15

$496.4M monthly imports

Compare All →

Court Cases

5 cases

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

34 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-01 · Updates monthly

Summary

The tariff classification of footwear from China.

Ruling Text

NY 869025 December 2, 1991 CLA-2-64:S:N:N3:D-347 869025 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6402.99.15 Mr. David A. Schlenger H.Z. Bernstein Co. Inc. One World Trade Center, Suite 1973 New York, NY 10048 RE: The tariff classification of footwear from China. Dear Mr. Schlenger: This classification decision under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) is being issued in accordance with the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). DATE OF INQUIRY : November 18, 1991. ON BEHALF OF : S. Goldberg & Co., Inc. DESCRIPTION OF MERCHANDISE : A child's low-cut athletic shoe, "Monster in My Pocket," with a plastic upper closed by a hook-and-loop fastener and a unit molded plastic sole. The sole overlaps the upper by more than 3/16 inch around slightly less than 40% of the periphery of the upper. HTS PROVISION : Other footwear with outer soles and uppers of plastics, other, not having a foxing-like band. HTS SUBHEADING : 6402.99.15 RATE OF DUTY : 6 percent ad valorem A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport

Related Rulings for HTS 6402.99.15

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (5)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.