Base
8506161990-04-11New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of footwear from Asia.Dear Ms. Brokaw:In your letter dated March 19, 1990, you requested a tariff classification ruling.The sample, Style 477, is a women's high top aerobic shoe with a leather upper and a unit molded rubber/plastic sole having a toe bumper and lateral stabilizers. In addition to laces, the upper is closed with a hook and loop strap at the top. The sample has two laces, one white and one a mottled gray, laced into alternate pairs of eyelets. You state that the shoes will be imported with instructions on lacing both pairs of laces simultaneously.The applicable subheading for the sample will be 6403.91.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for other footwear with outer soles of rubber/plastics and uppers of leather, covering the ankle, other, for other persons. The rate of duty will be 10 percent ad valorem.Regardless of the way the shoe is laced at importation, or even if it is not laced, and regardless of

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

6403.91.90

$203.4M monthly imports

Compare All →

Federal Register

1 doc

Related notices & rules

Court Cases

1 case

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

36 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, Federal Register, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-04-28 · Updates monthly

Summary

The tariff classification of footwear from Asia.Dear Ms. Brokaw:In your letter dated March 19, 1990, you requested a tariff classification ruling.The sample, Style 477, is a women's high top aerobic shoe with a leather upper and a unit molded rubber/plastic sole having a toe bumper and lateral stabilizers. In addition to laces, the upper is closed with a hook and loop strap at the top. The sample has two laces, one white and one a mottled gray, laced into alternate pairs of eyelets. You state that the shoes will be imported with instructions on lacing both pairs of laces simultaneously.The applicable subheading for the sample will be 6403.91.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for other footwear with outer soles of rubber/plastics and uppers of leather, covering the ankle, other, for other persons. The rate of duty will be 10 percent ad valorem.Regardless of the way the shoe is laced at importation, or even if it is not laced, and regardless of

Ruling Text

NY 850616 April 11,1990 CLA64:S:N:N3D:347 850616 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6403.91.90 Ms. Kristi L. Brokaw Avia Athletic Footwear P.O. Box 23309 Portland, OR 97223 RE: The tariff classification of footwear from Asia. Dear Ms. Brokaw: In your letter dated March 19, 1990, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The sample, Style 477, is a women's high top aerobic shoe with a leather upper and a unit molded rubber/plastic sole having a toe bumper and lateral stabilizers. In addition to laces, the upper is closed with a hook and loop strap at the top. The sample has two laces, one white and one a mottled gray, laced into alternate pairs of eyelets. You state that the shoes will be imported with instructions on lacing both pairs of laces simultaneously. The applicable subheading for the sample will be 6403.91.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for other footwear with outer soles of rubber/plastics and uppers of leather, covering the ankle, other, for other persons. The rate of duty will be 10 percent ad valorem. Regardless of the way the shoe is laced at importation, or even if it is not laced, and regardless of the presence or absence of lacing instructions, the shoe and the two laces are considered to be a single article as long as the shoe can simultaneously accomodate the two laces, the laces are of different color and/or design, and there is no evidence that the laces are intended to be used separately. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport

Related Rulings for HTS 6403.91.90

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.

Federal Register (1)

Trade notices, proposed rules, and final rules related to the tariff codes in this ruling.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (1)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.