Base
8479231989-12-14New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of a 4 in 1 telephone system fromHong Kong.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

8517.10.00

Compare All →

Court Cases

2 cases

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

36 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-07 · Updates real-time

Summary

The tariff classification of a 4 in 1 telephone system fromHong Kong.

Ruling Text

NY 847923 Dec 14, 1989 CLA-2-85:S:N:N1:109 847923 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 8517.10.00 Mr. Al Wyckoff Charles A. Redden, Inc. Hemisphere Center Route 1 & 9 South Newark, N.J. 07114 RE: The tariff classification of a 4 in 1 telephone system from Hong Kong. Dear Mr. Wyckoff: In your letter dated December 5, 1989, you requested a tariff classification ruling on behalf of Innovative Sourcing, Inc., New York, N.Y. The merchandise described as the Ultronic 4 in 1 phone system consists of a telephone set, digital clock, pad, pen calendar (magnets), box, and a plastic base. The system is imported as a set which acts as an office organizer. The essential character of the organizer appears to be imparted by the telephone set. The applicable subheading for the 4 in 1 phone system will be 8517.10.00, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for "[t]elephone sets." The rate of duty will be 8.5 percent ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport

Related Rulings for HTS 8517.10.00

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (2)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.