U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced
Primary HTS Code
9817.00.96
$616.6M monthly imports
Compare All →
Court Cases
10 cases
CIT & Federal Circuit
Ruling Age
35 years
1 related ruling
Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-04-28 · Updates monthly
Protest No. 330790100050, contesting denial of duty-free treatment for components of a hearing aid system under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUSA; parts; Nairobi Protocol
HQ 556383 December 20, 1990 CLA-2 CO:R:C:S 556383 SER CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 9817.00.96 District Director U.S. Customs Service P.O. Box 791 Great Falls, MT 59403 RE: Protest No. 330790100050, contesting denial of duty-free treatment for components of a hearing aid system under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUSA; parts; Nairobi Protocol Dear Sir: This protest, filed by Fritz Companies, Inc., on behalf of Cochlear Corporation, contests the classification and assessment of duties by your office on components of Cochlears' Nucleus 22 Channel Implant System, a hearing aid system, under subheading 9021.90.4040, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). The issue raised is whether these components, when imported separately, are eligible for duty-free treatment under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUSA, which provides duty-free treatment to articles specially designed or adapted for the handicapped. It is the position of Customs that this subheading does not apply to "parts" of these articles. Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 556179 dated December 9, 1991 (enclosed), an internal advice decision issued to your office, addressed the identical fact situation involved in this protest. In HRL 556179, Customs determined that the individual components of the Nucleus 22 Channel Implant System for the hearing impaired are not "parts", and, are eligible for duty- free treatment under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUSA. Accordingly, you should grant this protest in full. A copy of this decision, and HRL 556179, should be attached to the Customs Form 19, Notice of Action, to be returned to the protestant. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division
Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.
CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.