Base
1134511995-06-07HeadquartersCarriers

Vessel Repair Entry No. C04-0031554-2; TILLIE LYKES; V-41; Consumables; Repairs; 19 U.S.C.  1466

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database

Cross-Source Intelligence

Court Cases

2 cases

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

30 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-07 · Updates real-time

Summary

Vessel Repair Entry No. C04-0031554-2; TILLIE LYKES; V-41; Consumables; Repairs; 19 U.S.C.  1466

Ruling Text

HQ 113451 June 7, 1995 VES-13-18-R:IT:C 113451 GEV CATEGORY: Carriers Chief, Residual Liquidation and Protest Branch Commercial Operations U.S. Customs Service 6 World Trade Center New York, N.Y. 10048-002980 RE: Vessel Repair Entry No. C04-0031554-2; TILLIE LYKES; V-41; Consumables; Repairs; 19 U.S.C.  1466 Dear Sir: This is in response to your memorandum dated May 26, 1995, forwarding for our review a petition for review. Our findings in this matter are set forth below. FACTS: The TILLIE LYKES is a U.S.-flag vessel owned by Shawmut Bank Connecticut and operated by Lykes Bros. The vessel incurred foreign expenses in Bremerhaven, Germany, in February of 1995. The vessel subsequently arrived in the United States at Boston, Massachusetts, on February 20, 1995. A vessel repair entry was timely filed. An application for relief, dated March 28, 1995, was received by the New York Vessel Repair Liquidation Unit (VRLU). By letter dated April 14, 1995, the VRLU granted in part and denied in part the application for relief. Subsequently, a petition for review, dated May 3, 1995, was received by the VRLU on May 12, 1995. The petitioner requests that paint brushes and rollers listed on Kss-Odin invoice # 49 be considered non-dutiable as consumables. - 2 - ISSUE: Whether the costs for which the petitioner seeks relief are dutiable under 19 U.S.C.  1466. LAW AND ANALYSIS: Title 19, United States Code,  1466 (19 U.S.C.  1466), provides in pertinent part for payment of duty in the amount of 50 percent ad valorem on the cost of equipment, or any part thereof, purchased for, or the repair parts or materials to be used, or the expenses of repairs made in a foreign country upon a vessel documented under the laws of the United States to engage in foreign or coastwise trade, or vessels intended to engage in such trade. With respect to consumables, Customs has long-held that such items are duty-free when not used in connection with dutiable repairs (see C.I.E. 196/60). In regard to whether a particular article is considered to be a non-dutiable consumable as opposed to dutiable equipment for purposes of administering 19 U.S.C.  1466, the courts have held that "consumable supplies" are "supplies for the consumption, sustenance, and medical needs of the crew and passengers during the voyage." H.E. Warner, Trustee, American Mail Line, Ltd. v. United States, 28 CCPA 143, at 150, quoting from Southwestern Shipbuilding Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. App. 74, T.D. 40934 (1925). Based on the above definition, the paint brushes and rollers for which the petitioner seeks relief are not considered to be consumables but rather are equipment and therefore are dutiable under the vessel repair statute. This determination is further bolstered by the fact that paint brushes were specifically included in a list of articles that the court in Southwestern Equipment Co. considered to be equipment. HOLDING: The costs for which the petitioner seeks relief are dutiable under 19 U.S.C.  1466. Accordingly, the petition is denied. Sincerely, Arthur P. Schifflin Chief Carrier Rulings Branch

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (2)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.

United States Steel Group--A Unit of Usx Corporation Ak Steel Corporation Bethlehem Steel Corporation Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Ltv Steel Company, Inc. And National Steel Corporation and Geneva Steel Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of Alabama Laclede Steel Company Wci Steel, Inc. And Sharon Steel Corporation v. The United States, and Kawasaki Steel Corporation Nkk Corporation Kobe Steel, Ltd. Nippon Steel Corporation Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. And Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., and Usinas Siderurgicas De Minas Gerias, S.A., and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, and Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., and Dofasco, Inc., and Uss-Posco Industries, and Ipsco, Inc., and Preussag Stahl Ag Klockner Stahl Gmbh Krupp-Hoesch Stahl Ag Friedrich Krupp Ag Hoesch-Krupp and Thyssen Stahl Ag and Stelco, Inc., and Hoogovens Groep Bv and N.V.W. (u.s.a.), Inc., and Usinor Sacilor and Sollac, and Algoma Steel Inc., and Sidmar N v. And Tradearbed, Inc., Kern-Liebers Usa, Inc., and Bethlehem Steel Corporation Ak Steel Corporation Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Ltv Steel Company, Inc. National Steel Corporation and United States Steel Group--A Unit of Usx Corporation, and Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of Alabama Wci Steel, Inc. And Sharon Steel Corporation v. The United States, and Kawasaki Steel Corporation Kobe Steel, Ltd. Nkk Corporation Nippon Steel Corporation Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. And Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., and Usinas Siderurgicas De Minas Gerias, S.A., and Sidbec-Dosco, Inc., and Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Coated Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Steel Industries Co., Ltd. And Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, and Voest Alpine Stahl Ag, and Ilva, S.P.A., and Siderar S.A.I.C., the Successor of Propulsora Siderurgica S.A.I.C. And Aceros Parana, S.A.I.C., and Stelco, Inc., and Dofasco, Inc., and Sidmar N v. And Tradearbed, Inc., and Usinor Sacilor and Sollac, and Empresa Nacional Siderurgica, S.A. And Algoma Steel Inc., and Worthington Industries, Inc. Ilva Usa, Inc. And Krupp Steel Products, Inc. v. Thyssen Stahl Ag Thyssen Steel Detroit Co. Thyssen Inc. Preussag Stahl Ag Klockner Stahl Gmbh Friedrich Krupp Ag Hoesch-Krupp and Krupp-Hoesch Stahl Ag, Defendants/cross-Appellants, and Hoogovens Groep Bv and N.V.W. (u.s.a.), Inc., Defendants/cross-Appellants1996-11-21
95-1245Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Steel Group v. United States1996-08-29
Nos. 95-1245, 95-1257, 95-1306 and 95-1307Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit