U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced
Primary HTS Code
6402.91.40
$33.3M monthly imports
Compare All →
Court Cases
5 cases
CIT & Federal Circuit
Ruling Age
34 years
Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-01 · Updates monthly
Footwear, athletic; Band, foxing-like; Overlap; Encirclement, substantial
HQ 088443 May 24, 1991 CLA-2 CO:R:C:M 088443 DFC CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6402.91.40 John B. Pellegrini, Esq. Ross & Hardies 529 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10017-4608 RE: Footwear, athletic; Band, foxing-like; Overlap; Encirclement, substantial Dear Mr. Pellegrini: In a letter dated January 8, 1991, you inquired as to the tariff classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA), of certain athletic footwear which will be manufactured in China and /or Indonesia. A sample shoe along with its separate sole was submitted for examination. FACTS: The sample, "Altitude II," is a high-top athletic shoe with a plastic upper, the external surface area of which is assumed to be less than 10 percent textile, and a unit molded plastic bottom. You assert that a foxing-like band is not present because the overlap of the upper by the sole does not substantially encircle the entire shoe. Consequently, you claim that the "Altitude" is classifiable under subheading 6402.91.40, HTSUSA, as other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics, other, covering the ankle, and not having a foxing-like band. ISSUE: Does the overlap of the upper substantially encircle the shoe? Does the sample shoe possess a foxing-like band? - 2 - LAW AND ANALYSIS: T.D. 83-116 set forth certain guidelines relating to the characteristics of a foxing-like band. The characteristic which is relevant in this instances reads as follows: (5) A foxing-like band must encircle or substantially encircle the entire shoe. By our measurement the sole overlaps the upper by 1/4 inch or more around approximately 31 percent of the periphery of the upper. The remaining overlap measures 1/16 inch around 69 percent of the periphery of the upper. We have taken the position that an overlap of 1/16 inch is a cupping radius and does not constitute an overlap for purposes of determining substantial encirclement. An overlap of 31 percent of the periphery of the shoe by 1/4 inch or more is not considered "substantial encirclement" of the entire shoe. Consequently, the sample shoe does not possess a foxing-like band. HOLDING: Footwear represented by the sample is dutiable at the rate of 6 percent ad valorem under subheading 6402.91.40, HTSUSA. Sincerely, John Durant, Director Commercial Rulings Division 6cc AD NY Seaport 1cc Eric Francke NY Seaport 1cc A. Cataldo Boston 1cc H. Marshall LA Long Beach 1cc DD Seattle Wash 1cc Dist Dir Charleston S.C. 1cc Dist Dir Savannah 1cc Port Dir Nashville
Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.
CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.